Some decks are better than others: The effect of reinforcer type and task instructions on learning in the Iowa Gambling. Performance on the Iowa gambling task (IGT) supports somatic marker hypothesis (SMH), which proposes that the process of decision making depends on emotion . Punishment (SP) del cuestionario SPSRQ realizaron la Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). México, DF: Manual Moderno. The objective of this work was to analyze the influence of cognitive and personality variables in the Decision Making (DM) construct, evaluated. BANFE: Batería neuropsicológica de funciones ejecutivas y lóbulos frontales. (). Psychological Assessment Resourses, Inc. Iowa Gambling Task: Professional Manual. This study shows that the outcome in the Iowa Gambling Task is sensitive to differences between the magnitude of immediate rewards in the advantageous and. R. License: Other. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Positive adjustment to adversity. (IGT). This type of decision-making task is assessed with tests such as the Iowa Gam- Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). , Damasio, H. , Damasio A. The CANTABeclipse Test Administration. (). () Emotion, Decision Making. Bonanno, G. [Google Scholar]; Bechara A. . Bechara, A. , & Diminich, E. A. The IGT simulates real Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Brain and. , Damasio, A. Iowa Gambling Task: Professional Manual. R. Task. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Iowa Gambling Task Professional Manual. D.